Mr. Ashok Kumar Vs Commissioner CGST & Central Excise (Bombay High Court) Taking into consideration, the facts of the case, though the officers under the CGST Act, cannot seek custody of the arrested persons for completing the investigation, respondent’s contention that applicant’s detention in custody is necessary to prevent him from causing the evidence of […]
Vivaa Tradecom Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) The Gujarat High Court quashed the order and the demand notice passed by the respondent authority because of the procedural lapses and remitting the matter back to the respondent authority for fresh hearing. The first writ applicant, M/s Viva Tradecom Pvt. Ltd is a […]
The issue under consideration is whether the order passed by AO by denying the cross examination request of custom banker as well as bank officials is justified in law?
High Court restricted the Central Government from appointing technical members to the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunals (GSTAT) until further orders.
whether the serving of assessment order by uploading it on web portal and not communicated separately to the assessee will be considered as valid under law?
whether Tribunal is right in holding that amendment made to Section 40(a)(ia) by Finance Act, 2010 would apply retrospectively though the amendment is made with effect from 01.4.2010?
Punjab National Bank Vs. Mithilanchal Industries Pvt. Ltd. (Gujarat High Court) In the present case, the borrower took an objection of non-compliance of sub-section (3), in his objection / representation given sub-section (3A), but despite the same the Bank – Secured Creditor in the present case rejected the objection instead of ensuring the compliance of […]
Revenue Bar Association Vs Union of India (Madras High Court) Madras High Court restrained the Central Government from appointing technical members to the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunals (GSTAT) until further orders vide its order dated 17.08.2020. FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER /JUDGEMENT Heard Mr.Rahul Unnikrishnan, learned counsel for the appellant and […]
The issue under consideration is whether the Entertainment Tax will be levied on Master System Cable Operator?
CIT Vs Shardlow India Ltd. (Madras High Court) In this case The assessment was reopened on 06.8.2013 by issuing a notice under Section 148 of the Act on the ground that the assessee transferred some portion of its land at Sembium to its holding company namely M/s.Simpson & Co. Ltd., for a consideration of Rs.375 […]
