The issue under consideration is whether the delayed payment of interest on delayed refund becomes part of the principal amount will be eligible for interest under Section 244A?
the petitioner seek quashing of notification for increasing the rate of tax payable in respect of Petrol and Diesel and fixing the same at 28% and 21.8% respectively.
The issue under consideration is that the petitioner has two aadhaar card with two different date of birth. Because of which her status i.e whether she is a minor or major as per act is in question.
Kanishka Matta Vs Union of India (Madhya Pradesh High Court) The petitioner’s contention is that the word “money” is not included in Section 67(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 and therefore, once the “money” is not included under Section 67(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 the Investigating Agency / Department is not competent to seize […]
The issue under consideration is whether revised amount can be taken as the quantified amount to test the eligibility for Sabka Vikas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (SVLDR)?
Having heard learned counsels appearing for the parties, without any opinion on merits of the show cause notice dated 11.1.2020 issued by respondent authorities to the petitioner, at this stage, interest of justice would be served, if the concerned respondent authorities shall hear the petitioner on the issue of show cause notice and after hearing the petitioner, pass necessary orders.
The issue under consideration is whether seizure of the cash amount to the tune of Rs 66 lakhs by Senior Intelligence Officer at the time of Search Operation is justified in law?
The issue under consideration is whether the indexed cost of acquisition can be reduced for the purpose of computing book profits under Section 115JB of the Act?
Prasanna Kumar Bisoi Vs Union of India (Orissa High Court) In a recent ruling passed by Hon’ble Orissa high court, held that w.r.t. interest liability for delayed payment of GST under Section 50(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, is required to be paid on net cash tax liability in view of the decision taken by […]
The issue under consideration is whether the assessee being employee of Public Sector Undertaking (PSU) and Nationalised Banks treated as government employee for the purpose of exemption u/s (10AA)(i)?
