Basic grievance of the Petitioners are that their bills for export of onions were prior to issuance of notification dated 14th September, 2020 whereby export of onions has been prohibited; yet those are not being permitted to be exported.
Telangana High Court directs the bank to allow petitioner to operate bank account provisionally attached by Revenue. Provisional attachment order cannot continue after the expiry of one year. Continuation as such would be violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution of India and would be wholly without jurisdiction.
The issue under consideration is whether the rejection of advance authorization against the shipments for fulfillment of export obligations is justified in law?
Gurvinder Singh Sohal Vs Central Bureau of Investigation (Special CBI Court, Panchkula) As per the prima facie case of the prosecution, applicant- accused along with co-accused demanded bribe/undue advantage of Rs.9 lacs from the complainant on 06.08.2020 and accepted Rs.3 lacs as part payment of bribe on 06.08.2020 and further demanded and accepted remaining bribe […]
Lakshya Budhiraja Vs Union of India (Delhi High Court) The petition has been listed before this Bench by the Registry in view of the urgency expressed therein. The same has been heard by way of video conferencing. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to grant an opportunity of hearing […]
The High Court in this regard stayed CAG audit of a private limited company providing warehouse and logistical support services in SEZ. CAG was directed not to carry out any further Service Tax audit of petitioner.
The issue under consideration is whether payment for the acquisition of leasehold rights over immovable property is rental income and hence eligible for TDS u/s 194I ?
Rainbow Infrastructure Private Limited & Anr Vs Assistant Commissioner (Calcutta High Court) Hon’ble Calcutta High Court has issued notice to Centre and State Government in the matter of Latika Ghosh Vs ACST, Raiganj Charge & others, W.P. A. No. 7272 of 2020, in the matter of Rainbow Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ACST, Barrackpore Zone & […]
The issue under consideration is whether the writ petition filed against credit rating agency by stating that they are not authorised to discharge “Public Functions” as it is not characterised as ‘State ‘ will be sustain in law?
Online fantasy sports games offered on the Dream 11 platforms were not considered as gambling/betting as the format of online fantasy game offered by Dream 11 was a game of mere skill and their business had protection under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India.
