The issue under consideration is whether the denial of the refund to the petitioner against exports of goods outside India on the sole ground that petitioner had exported goods through Foreign Post Offices is justified in law?
Macleods Pharmaceutical Ltd. Vs Prakash Kumar (Himachal Pradesh High Court) Petitioner had filed TRAN-1 form for CENVAT Credit which was made admissible and credited to its Electronic Credit Ledger account on 26.10.2017. It was further submitted that the company could not amend TRAN-1 form as per the provisions of Goods and Services Tax Act. Therefore, […]
Solamalai Automobiles Private Limited vs The Designated Committee (Madras High Court) The Madras High Court has held that for cases falling under ‘Amount in arrears’ category under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, the deposits should be adjusted after the determination of the amount payable. Department’s contention that the sum paid was to […]
PV Constructions Vs The Executive Engineer (Orissa High Court) The main issue involved in such matters is that the difficulty faced by the contractors due to change in the regime regarding works contract under GST. The grievance of the petitioner is that in view of the introduction of the GST, petitioner is required to pay […]
The issue under consideration is whether the petition filed by the CA for seeking to direct the Institute of Cost Accountants of India to use the acronym ICOAI instead of ICAI will be sustain by the High Court?
The issue under consideration is whether an ‘Anti Virus Software’ would fall within the ambit of the definition of ‘Information Technology Software’ as defined u/s 65 (53a) of the Finance Act, 1994?
The issue under consideration is whether any clerical or arithmetical error made by an applicant in SVLDRS-1 also falls within the ambit of Section 128 of Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019?
Ayush Medical Association Vs State of Chhattisgarh (Chhattisgarh High Court) 1. Heard finally with the consent of both the parties as urgency was pressed upon the ground that the issue involved in both these petitions are relating to advertisement for appointments of Community Health Workers by training. Since the the facts and issue involved in […]
Ramgopal Varma and Another Vs Perumalla Amrutha (Telangana High Court) No doubt a person undoubtedly has a right to privacy in relation to her family, marriage, procreation, motherhood and child-bearing and none can publish anything concerned with these matters without his/her consent. Yet, there is an exception to the said rule i.e., that any publication […]
Hari Prakash Vs State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. (Himachal Pradesh High Court) The petitioner, a Junior Basic Teacher, with 01.03.1958 as his date of birth was due for superannuation on 29.02.2016. The date of his annual increment was 1st March of every year. He being a State awardee was granted an extension of one […]
