This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Employee Who Retired on 31st not eligible to Increment due on 1st of Next Month
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Hari Prakash Vs State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. (Himachal Pradesh High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Himachal Pradesh HC
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Hari Prakash Vs State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. (Himachal Pradesh High Court)
The petitioner, a Junior Basic Teacher, with 01.03.1958 as his date of birth was due for superannuation on 29.02.2016. The date of his annual increment was 1st March of every year. He being a State awardee was granted an extension of one year in service in light of State Government instruction, dated 30.11.2015. After availing the extended service, petitioner superannuated on 28.02.2017. His representation requesting one day extension in service has been rejected. Hence he has preferred instant writ petition to ...
