Pam Agro Industries Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) It is not in dispute that the petitioners imported cashew kernel (broken) from Vietnamese suppliers for a price ranging from Rs. 151/- to Rs. 180 /- per kg in Indian currency which is the transaction value ordinarily required to be considered for levy of custom duty […]
Tvl. Weather Maker Vs Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Madras High Court) The petitioner is engaged in trading of LLOYD Air Conditioners. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner had also been doing maintenance contract. For the said service rendered by the petitioner, the petitioner was paid the charges. According to the petitioner, the […]
CIT Vs Metropolitan Transport Corporation (Chennai) Ltd. (Madras High Court) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in holding that the provision for wage arrears of Rs.5.80 crores is an ascertained liability, notwithstanding the fact that the said provision has been accounted on cash […]
BT (India) Private Limited Vs ITO (Delhi High Court) Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, according to us, if the statutory authority exercises its powers without determining whether or not it has jurisdiction in the matter, that itself, may, in certain cases, call for interference. The record shows that the application of AAR […]
JAP Modular Furniture Concepts Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State Of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) In this case provisional GST registration of the writ applicants under the GST Act was also blocked / inactivated and final registration was not granted to the writ applicants under the GST Act on account of cancellation of registration under Vat. The […]
PCIT Vs Landbase India Ltd (Delhi High Court) Since the security deposit continues as a liability in the books of the assessee club, the assessing officer could not have added the same to the income of the assessee club. The tribunal has correctly, in our opinion, deleted the addition. FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF […]
Certain errors were made while furnishing the details outward supplies in the Form GSTR-1 on account of which there was a mismatch between the GST portal data and data on the ICEGATE customs portal and hence, the refund of the IGST was not granted for the month of July, 2017.
Chinar Shipping & Infrastructure (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court) It could not be out of place to refer to a decision of Karnataka High Court in the case of Kiran Borewells Vs. Union of India wherein the impugned order was set aside finding that decision had been taken without providing […]
Precision Gasification Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union Of India (Gujarat High Court) The respondents are directed to either open the online portal, so as to enable the writ applicants to again file rectified Form GST TRAN-1 electronically or accept the manually filed from the GST TRAN-1 with necessary corrections on, or before, 18.05.2021. FULL TEXT […]
If the assessee was otherwise eligible to refund, the refund claim ought not to be denied on the ground of technical glitches and error occurred due to auto-population in Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN) software. Nothing can be more unfair.
