M/s. Sri Gopikrishna Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd Vs State of Tripura and Ors (Tripura High Court) Quantum of penalty for transportation the taxable goods without the cover of valid e-way bill Learned counsel has fairly stated that only violation that has been noticed by the taxing authority is of not carrying the valid e-way bill against the […]
RCI Industries And Technologies Ltd Vs Commissioner DGST Delhi & Ors. (Delhi High Court) If an officer of the Central GST initiates intelligence- based enforcement action against a taxpayer administratively assigned to State GST, the officers of the former would not transfer the said case to their counterparts in the latter department and they would […]
Gopikrishna Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Tripura (Tripura High Court) Mr. Majumder, learned counsel has contended that there is no fraudulent intention or malafide act indulged by the petitioner. It was a lapse under very abnormal circumstances of lockdown and that aspect of the matter has not been considered at all. Moreover, Mr. Majumder […]
Delhi HC sets aside director disqualification in Anjali Bhargava vs Union of India case. Reactivation of DIN and DSC ordered for CFSS-2020 benefit.
Kantibhai Dharamshibhai Narola Vs ACIT (Gujarat High Court) (i) The Court should be guided by the reasons recorded for the reassessment and not by the reasons or explanation given by the Assessing Officer at a later stage in respect of the notice of reassessment. To put it in other words, having regard to the entire […]
Explore the Delhi High Court’s decision in Anant Narain vs. Union of India, addressing the revival of DIN/DSC for directors under CFSS-2020. Learn about the scheme’s purpose, conditions, and implications for disqualified directors of struck-off companies.
Power to attach the bank account must therefore be exercised only in strict compliance with the statutory power, and could not be extended to cover situations which were not expressly contemplated by the section. Absent the statutory precondition for exercise of the power of attachment, any order under Section 83 was wholly illegal and unsustainable.
Unabsorbed depreciation pertaining to the assessment year 1997-98 to 2001-02 can be carry forward and adjusted after the lapse of eight assessment years in view of the section 32(2) as amended by the Finance Act, 2001.
V. Gopalan Vs CCIT (Kerala High Court) The appellant admittedly took voluntary retirement in the year 2001. He had also claimed deduction under Section 10 (10C) (viii) and relief under Section 89 (1) of the Income Tax Act while filing his return of income for the relevant assessment year. The claim came to be rejected […]
Kailash Chandra Bisoyi Vs State of Odisha (Orissa High Court) The main issue involved in such matters is that the difficulty faced by the contractors due to change in the regime regarding works contract under GST. The grievance of the petitioner is that in view of the introduction of the GST, petitioner is required to […]
