This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Sec 138 NI Act- Complainant to prove the existence of a debt
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- V.P. Zacharia Vs State of Kerala (Kerala High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Kerala High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
V.P. Zacharia Vs State of Kerala (Kerala High Court)
his is a case where the 2nd respondent/accused has been successful in rebutting the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The fact that there was an earlier transaction in the year 1995 and that liability had been settled by repayment is a factor which would lend credence to the case of the 2nd respondent/accused that Ext.P1 cheque was one issued as security in the discharge of that liability and such cheque was misused by the appellant/complainant to make it appear that there was a subse...
Sir/madam, you are doing good..
1) I want judgement on sec 138 ni act in favour of accused…
2) judgement on gst return in sec 138 ni act in favour of accused.. please reply…on gmail…. Thank you…