Rohan Tanna Vs Union of India (Chhattisgarh High Court) Applicants are arrested for commission of offences punishable under Sections 16 & 132 (1) (b) & (c) of the GST Act. Section 138 of the GST Act deals with compounding of offences. Offence registered against applicants under Section 132 (1) of the GST Act is made […]
Jharkhand HC rejects discharge plea in Anup Kumar Lakhotia case. Charges framed under IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act. Legal analysis and key details.
Chhattisgarh High Court grants anticipatory bail to Union Bank of India employees in a Prevention of Money Laundering Act case. No custodial interrogation required.
Paradise Rubber Industries Vs PCIT (ITAT Amritsar) Admittedly the present case before us is a case of Limited scrutiny selected for particular points reproduced hereinabove confined to 4 issues. The issue for which the PCIT issued the show cause notice was entirely different than the four issues examined under limited scrutiny by the assessing officer. […]
Coforge Limited (Formerly Known AS NIIT Technologies Ltd) Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court) Conclusion: Commuted value of lease rent at 11 times the rent payable for 90 years @ Rs 708913/- which amounted to Rs 7798042/- was deductible as expenditure in the year of payment as assessee chose to incur the liability of a crystallised […]
Petitioner along with co-accused was found to have indulged themselves in evasion of the State Tax to the Govt., by flouting bogus firms and showing fake billings and transactions in order to draw the refund of the GST payment, and thereby had caused a loss to the tune of Rs.8.95 crore to the State Government.
It is recorded that this court has set aside the impugned adjudication order only on the ground of violation of principle of natural justice and has not gone into the merits of the case itself.
Restriction imposed under Rule 86A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 should be lifted after the expiry of one year from the date of imposition of such restriction.
Parvin Kumar Batta Vs DCIT (Delhi High Court) 1. Allowed, subject to the applicant/petitioner curing the deficiencies referred to in the captioned application within 15 days from today. CM No. 15835/2021 2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 5166/2021 & CM No. 15834/2021 [Application filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking stay on the operation […]
Pune Saraf Association & Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors. (Bombay High Court) It is an admitted and undisputed position that currently, there are insufficient Hallmark Centres in the country. This, according to us, is a decisive factor to be taken into consideration at the interlocutory hearing of this Writ Petition. Whilst we appreciate […]
