Sonia Fazal Khan Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court) In this case Asif (Son) says that although his parents are alive, there are two flats and both are what he describes as ‘a shared household’ and therefore he, the son, has some sort of enforceable legal right or entitlement to either or both of […]
Piyush Kumar Anchal Vs State of C.G. (Chhattisgarh High Court) here is serious dispute between the parties, whether the petitioner’s mother is first wife of the deceased Government servant late Shri Mohan Lal Anchal or the mother of Suresh Kumar Anchal, who also claimed compassionate appointment being another son of late Shri Mohan Lal Anchal from […]
Ali Cotton Mill Vs Appellate Joint Commissioner (ST) (Andhra Pradesh High Court) As the Rule 108 of APGST Rules, 2017 permits filing of appeal electronically, the petitioner had, first attempted to file the appeal electronically but the same was not received by the Department Website due to some glitches and therefore, the petitioner filed the […]
Thiru. Yasar Arabath, Vs Deputy Commissioner (State Taxes) (Madras High Court) In this case there is Sufficient materials available to show the petitioner without having inward supply of goods, have issued fake invoices without actual movement and supply of. He made total cash payment of Rs.7,30,324/- only as against the Rs.5,23,66,944/-. Hence, the offence committed […]
CIT Vs Manish Build Well Pvt. Ltd (Delhi High Court) Conditions prescribed in Rule 46A must be shown to exist before additional evidence is admitted and every procedural requirement mentioned in the Rule has to be strictly complied with so that the Rule is meaningfully exercised and not exercised in a routine or cursory manner. […]
Admittedly, the assessee who was an individual in that case was not carrying on any business and the remuneration and interest received by the assessee from the partnership firm cannot be termed to be a turn over of the assessee (individual).
Hitech Corporation Ltd. (Formerly known as Hitech Plast Ltd.) Vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court) It is settled law that once a query is raised during the assessment proceedings and the assessee has replied to it, it follows that the query raised was a subject of consideration of the Assessing Officer while completing the assessment. It […]
Alapan Bandyopadhyay Vs Union Of India And Anr (Delhi High Court) Learned counsel for the Petitioner strenuously argued that under Rule 6(2) of the Central Administrative Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1987, it is the statutory right and option of the Petitioner, being a retired person, to file an O.A. before the Kolkata Bench, as he was […]
Taqa Neyveli Power Company Private Limited Vs Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Madras High Court) As has been pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner assessee that, once an appeal has been filed against the very revisional order under Section 263 of the Act, where date has been fixed for hearing, at least till […]
CIT (International Taxation) Vs Gracemac Corporation (Delhi High Court) This Court is in agreement with the opinion of the Tribunal that Section 271(1)(c) penalty can only be levied in such cases where concealment of income has been proven. If the quantum order itself has been set aside in an appeal preferred by the respondent/assessee, there […]
