Ericsson India Private Limited Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court) It is not as if the petitioner/assessee is not offering unearned revenue for tax; it is only on account of accounting policy followed consistently that unearned revenue is offered for tax in the year in which services are rendered and/or goods are sold. Thus, the transaction, […]
Niraj Jaidev Arya Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) During the course of arguments, it was pointed out by the learned Senior Advocate appearing for the applicant that the respondent-Department has already attached immovable property belonging to the applicant in excess of the amount of alleged evasion or fraudulent claim of input tax credit […]
N.E. Logistics And Anr. Vs Union of India And 2 Ors. (Guwahati High Court) The liability to pay a service tax is not upon a presumption nor can it be based upon a state of indeterminateness on the part of the authorities. The liability to pay a tax has to be conclusively determined that for […]
Shah Industries Through Proprietor Vishal Hastimal Sakaria Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) The show cause notice is bereft on any material particulars or information. In the absence of any material particulars and the details, it is difficult for any individual to respond to such a vague show cause notice. Probably what the Authority […]
Vijaya Vs Shekharappa (Karnataka High Court) Legislature has cautiously worded sub-section (1) of Section 143A of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not to make it mandatory in all cases where clauses (a) and (b) of sub-section (1) would empower the learned Magistrate before whom proceedings are pending consideration to award interim compensation. It is the discretion […]
Parekh Plastichem Distributors LLP Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) The plain reading of Section-56 of the Act would indicate that if any tax, which is ordered to be refunded under Sub-section (5) of Section-54 to any applicant, is not refunded within sixty days from the date of receipt of the application under Sub-section […]
According to Section 83(2) of the CGST Act, every provisional attachment order ceases to have effect after the expiry of a period of one year from the date the order was passed under Section 83(1) of the CGST Act.
GMR Aerospace Engineering Limited Vs Union of India (Telangana and Andhra Pradesh High Court) Hon’ble Telangana and Andhra Pradesh High Court in GMR AEROSPACE ENGINEERING LIMITED AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS mentioned that as long as the services are used for authorized operations of the SEZ unit. the same should be exempted from the […]
Rajkamal Healds And Reeds Pvt. Ltd. Vs Assistant Director of Income Tax (Gujarat High Court) HC disposed of this writ application reserving the liberty for the writ applicant to file an appropriate application addressed to the Chief Commissioner Income Tax under Section 119 (2) (b) of the Act referred to above with a request to […]
CIT Vs Shankar Krishnan (Bombay High Court) Whether Notional Interest on Security Deposit paid by employer for accommodation of its employee will also be included while calculating perquisites. BRIEF FACTS: 1. The Assessee is a salaried employee with McKinley & Company Inc., India. The Assessee was provided with rent free accommodation in Cuffe Parade, Mumbai […]
