Surani Steel Tubes Limited Vs ITO (Gujarat High Court) High Court noted that the entire base for reopening assessment is on the premise that there was ‘information’ supplied by the Investigation Wing and the Assessing Officer has made cursorily reference to high value transaction of Rs.26,42,027/- as well as also referred to accommodation entry entered […]
High court held that licensing of software products of Microsoft in the Territory of India by the Respondent was not taxable in India as Royalty under Section 9(1)(vi) of the Act read with Article 12 of the Indo US DTAA.
Allahabad High court held that granting of anticipatory bail does not arise for an offence which is bailable and a direction for the same can be issued only in respect of non-bailable and cognizable offences, the present anticipatory bail application deserves rejection and, accordingly, it is rejected.
Issue an appropriate Writ, Order(s) or Direction(s) of like nature to set aside the action of removal of videos of petitioner on his You Tube channel and subsequent termination of his You Tube channel by respondent No.2 and further direct respondent no.2 to restore the You Tube channel of petitioner which was maintained on You Tube portal with the name and style of “Gurudev Siyag Sidh Yoga Free” and allow him to operate the said channel.
Bhagwati Transformer Corp. Vs Government of NCT of Delhi (Delhi High Court) 1. By this order, I shall decide the above applications seeking interim relief, inasmuch as to stay the impugned order. 2. The common case of the petitioners in these petitions, as contended by their counsel, is a challenge to an order dated February […]
Pigments & Allieds Vs Carboline (India) Pvt. Ltd. (Bombay High Court) In the present case, on a fair reading of provisions of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, as applicable in Maharashtra, it is evident under definition 2(d) that the agreement in question was required to be stamped when it was first executed. The agreement was first […]
V.R.S. Traders Vs Assistant Commissioner (State Taxes) (Madras High Court) As per section 74 of CGST Act, 2017 the first step, if the revenue wants to initiate proceedings under Section 74, has to serve a notice to pay the amount of tax along with interest payable under Section 50 and a penalty equivalent to 15% […]
Court held has held that the principle of vicarious liability can not be extended indefinitely. In the present case also to force the owner of the conveyance to pay the tax, penalty and fine on the goods would mean that the owner of the conveyance is also foisted with the vicarious liability of any mis-declaration/fraud by the owner of the goods despite the proviso engrafted on to Sub Section 2 of Section 130 of the Act.
Prashanthi Affiliates Vs Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Karnataka High Court) The main contention of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner before this Court is that the learned Special JMFC (Sales Tax) Court ought not to have issued the order of attachment of property through BBMP Commissioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner brought […]
Yashpal Vs State of U.P. and Another (Allahabad High Court) clause (e) of sub-Section (1) of Section 72 of U.P. Excise Act, 1910 provides that whenever an offence is punishable under this Act, every animal, cart, vessel or other conveyance used in carrying such receptacle or package shall be liable to The power of confiscation […]
