Nanjappa Vs State By Chikkajala Police Station (Karnataka High Court) (ii) The following guidelines are given to the registry and also to the District Courts all over the State to evolve mechanism with modern technology to curb the practice of fraud on the Court and verify every application for being filed for regular or anticipatory […]
Satara District Bar Association Satara Vs State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court) There is certainly an element of confidentiality in the notings by Judges of any Committee of this Court. There is also very good reason why such notings should not in fact ever be disclosed or allowed to be disclosed. Whether or not this […]
Sporta Technologies Pvt. Ltd Vs Unfading OPC Private Limited (Delhi High Court) It is averred in the plaint that Plaintiffs are a hugely popular and well-known fantasy sports platform launched in 2012 and are the official fantasy sports partner of the International Council of Cricket (ICC), The Campeonato Nacional de Liga de Premiera Division (La […]
Laxman Vs State of Rajasthan (Rajasthan High Court) The provisions of Rule 2(p), Rules 58 and 75 of the Rules, 1958 clearly reflect that for a settlement arrived at between the parties by mutual negotiations, the same has to be sent to the State Government, Labour Commissioner and the conciliation officer concerned. The provisions are […]
Iqbal Khan Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others (Allahabad High Court) (a) A provision for compassionate appointment is an exception to the principle that there must be an equality of opportunity in matters of public employment. The exception to be constitutionally valid has to be carefully structured and implemented in order to confine compassionate […]
PCIT Vs Dinesh Kumar Bansal (HUF) (Calcutta High Court) The Court : In all these applications the revenue has sought for condonation of delay in filing the appeals before this Court under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act, in brevity) challenging the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata […]
Tvl. Alamelu Contracts Vs Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Madras High Court) The petitioner has challenged the impugned order, dated 16.07.2019, cancelling the Goods and Services Tax Registration. The impugned order preceded the show cause notice, dated 04.07.2019. It is the specific case of the petitioner that the petitioner was not having business and therefore, the […]
Swastik Plastics Vs Commissioner of DGST (Delhi High Court) Delhi HIgh Court stay Adjudication Order passed in consequence of investigation/search/seizure and SCN issued under Section 74 of the GST Act for the reason that that the authority who had conducted the investigation/search/seizure cannot conduct the adjudication proceedings as there is likelihood of Bias. FULL TEXT […]
M. M. Traders State of U P (Allahabad High Court) All the aforequoted writ petitions have been filed aggrieved with blocking of input tax credit by the concerned authority under Rule 86 A of the C.G.S.T. /U.P. G.S.T. Rules, 2017. Rule 86 A(2) of the C.G. & S.T. Rules, 2017, which provides as under :- […]
Trademark ‘ADIT’ which was first adopted by the Plaintiff, the Defendant who is also using the name ‘Institute of Chartered Tax Advisers of India Ltd.’, cannot be allowed to launch a course under a name which is identical to that of the Plaintiff.
