Veteran Facility Management Services Pvt Ltd Vs Union of India (Gauhati High Court) In this case the petitioner firm express their willingness to pay the defaulted tax amount plus the interest and the penalty as may be assessed by the department but because of the precarious financial condition they are unable to pay it in […]
PCIT Vs Moser Baer India Ltd. (Delhi High Court) A perusal of the aforesaid order of Apex Court in Civil Appeal No.4705/2014 makes it clear that the respondent company Moser Baer India Ltd. is not financially viable and is in liquidation before NCLT. The order also makes it clear that even if the Revenue were […]
DR Vidyottma Jha Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr. (Delhi High Court) In our view, it is not for this Court to direct payment of ex gratia compensation of Rs.1 Crore to all families whose members died due to Covid-19. The GNCTD has already formulated a uniform policy for the payment of ex […]
Concrete Additives and Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Vs S N Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd. (Bombay High Court) Mr. Menon’s contention that the tax invoices have been accepted by the respondent and therefore it is required to be presumed that there is an arbitration agreement between the parties also cannot be accepted. The acceptance of the tax […]
J M Financial and Investment Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court) HC held that since four years had expired from the end of the relevant assessment year, as provided under Section 151(1) of the Act, it is only the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner who could […]
Raimaladitya Textile Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (Bombay High C0urt) The allegations in the reasons recorded are that as per information summary available to Revenue there is company by the name Raimaladitya Textile Pvt. Ltd., from whom bogus loan has been taken in F.Y. 2012-13 in the sum of Rs.40,88,06,800/- and the said Raimaladitya Textile Ltd., […]
The petitioner’s grievance, as noted above, is that immediately, after this Court had quashed the earlier provisional attachment order on 22.03.2021, a fresh order was passed on 26.03.2021.
High Court held that Arbitral Tribunal had rightly directed refund of the amount recovered by BSNL from invocation of the Performance Bank Guarantee in question. There is no principle in law whereby BSNL could be permitted to retain the Performance Security after it had acknowledged due performance of the Contract.
R. Geethabanu vs. Government of Tamil Nadu (Madras High Court, Madurai Bench) The Madras High held that the aggrieved person cannot file claim petitions both under the Motor Vehicles Act ,1988 as well as the Workmen Compensation Act,1923 in respect of the very same accident. The court also held that previous decisions of various High […]
Refund could not be denied only on the ground that only a part amount of the tax was paid through the electronic cash ledger as Respondents had failed to understand the distinction between the availment and the utilization of the input tax credit.
