The Bombay High Court maintained the cancellation of a liquor license post the demise of the license holder, clarifying the rules concerning license transfer to legal heirs or partners.
Explore case of Virtusa Consulting Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT in Telangana High Court, where petitioner seeks disposal of a rectification application and grant of refunds for pre-paid taxes.
Orissa High Court mandates AO to review Legend Steel’s stay application, emphasizing on judicial discretion over administrative circulars for fair assessment.
Madras High Court rules in favor of Packirisamy Senthilkumar, ensuring fair tax process and correcting procedural errors under Section 148A(d).
In the case of Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. vs DCIT, the Bombay High Court examines the requirement of tangible material for reopening an assessment. This analysis explores the claim of deduction on payment made to settle a class action suit and the court’s decision
Read the full text of the judgment/order of the Bombay High Court in the case of Oerlikon Balzers Coating India Pvt. Ltd. vs Union of India. The court strikes down a condition in DTVSV, benefiting the assessee.
Jharkhand HC in case of Shree Ram Agrotech has set aside demand order & consequent recovery proceedings in view of non-compliance with provisions regarding issuance of Show-Cause Notice and adjudication order as prescribed under GST law.
Dive into the case of Jyote Motors Bengal Pvt. Ltd. v. Additional Director, DGGI, where the Calcutta High Court adjudicates on the constitutional validity of Section 16(4) of the CGST Act.
In a recent case, Delhi High Court ruled that proviso to Section 45(1) of Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) is an exception for women, exempting them from satisfying the twin conditions of Section 45. The court held that sub-classifying women under different categories and applying twin conditions would violate Article 14 of Constitution. The applicant, accused in a complaint case related to the Unitech Group, was granted bail after undergoing extensive investigations and custody for over 20 months.
Explore landmark ruling in Citibank N.A Vs S.K. Ojha case by Bombay High Court, confirming that post-Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme determination, the Assessing Officer lacks jurisdiction to reopen tax assessments under Section 143 of Income Tax Act. Unearth key insights from this case setting a precedent for businesses under KVSS.
