Madras High Court revives GST registration in a landmark decision. Analysis of legal proceedings, arguments, and court’s ruling.
Delhi High Court upholds deletion of disallowed management fees to ATS Infrastructure Ltd. in PCIT vs. Anand Divine Developers Pvt. Ltd. for AY 2013-14 and 2014-15.
Rajasthan High Court held that imposition of penalty u/s. 270A of the Income Tax Act unjustified as application filed u/s. 270AA for immunity of penalty not decided by AO within prescribed time limit.
Madras High Court directs de-freezing of Jey Tech Moulds Dies’ bank account as it filed a GST appeal and deposited 10% of the outstanding demand. Get the details here.
Delhi High Court ruling on Aasanvish Technology Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. vs. Directorate General of GST Intelligence. Officer with highest demand has jurisdiction.
Jharkhand High Court drops criminal proceedings under CGST Act, Section 174 IPC. Summon duly replied. Analysis of the case – Satyendra Singh Kushwah vs. State of Jharkhand.
Deduction under section 80IB (10) was allowable to assessee as it had a reasonable & bona fide cause for not filing the return of income within the time permitted under Section 139(1). Once in the given facts, assessee had been held entitled to claim the specifically computed deductions, then it should not be burdened with taxes which it was otherwise not liable to pay under law.
Andhra Pradesh High Court held that the phrase ‘duty of customs’ used in Section 26(1)(a) of SEZ Act only refers to duty leviable under Customs Act, 1962 but the said phrase does not include cess under GST Compensation Act. Thus, SEZ units are not exempted from payment of compensation cess on import of coal.
Explore Rule 142(1) of CGST Rules mandating Section 74 notice to be accompanied by an electronic summary in GST DRC-01 & DRC-02. Learn about compliance during adjudication.
Since the penalty was reduced from 300% to 100% of the tax sought to be evaded, assessee was entitled to the benefit of Section 279(1A) of Income Tax.
