Read the full judgment of Allahabad High Court in Commissioner Vs Peethambra Granites case, upholding 5% sales tax on granite stone blocks and pieces. Analysis of entry No.109 explained.
Reckitt Benckiser India Private Limited Vs Union of India & Ors (Delhi High Court) The Delhi High Court has upheld the validity of the anti-profiteering provisions under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) law, marking a significant development in India’s taxation landscape. The anti-profiteering provisions under the GST law were introduced to ensure that businesses […]
Bombay High Court held that denial of benefit under Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 on erroneous allegation of non-filing of Form 4 unjustified as the same is already filed much before the extended date.
Krishnaawtar Kabra L/H of Jagannath Rampal Kabra Vs ITO (Gujarat High Court) In a recent judgment, the Gujarat High Court addressed the issue of the validity of a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to a deceased assessee. The court ruled that the reopening of the assessment based on such […]
Understand how the Gujarat High Court recently addressed the legality of issuing a notice Section 148 of the Income Tax Act in the name of a deceased taxpayer with this blog post.
Madhya Pradesh High Court’s decision on writ against Section 148 reassessment notice in Amrit Homes Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT. Understand legal nuances and implications.
Karnataka High Court revolved around Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 in case of Shashikala Jayaram vs. Appayappa – can cheque issued by spouse be prosecutable?
Read the detailed analysis of Calcutta High Court’s judgment in Arvind Gupta vs Assistant Commissioner of Revenue State Taxes, affirming GST Appellate Authority’s discretion to condone appeal delays beyond four months. Explore the implications and legal considerations.
Allahabad High Court’s judgment condoning 1365 days delay in a tax appeal, analyzing reasons and legal justifications. Key insights on delay condonation in tax cases.
Read the full text of Bombay High Court’s judgment quashing the notice under Section 148 for AY 2016-17 in Vardhaman vs. ITO case. Analysis and implications discussed.
