Pramukh Realty Vs C.C.E. & S.T.-Daman (CESTAT Ahmedabad) The brief facts of the case are that the appellant have pad service tax on Construction of residential Complex for which they have entered into the agreement for sale of flats, accordingly they have paid service tax on sale of flats. Subsequently the sale of flats has […]
Radius Corporate Solutions (India) Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Service Tax VII (CESTAT Mumbai) Though none appeared on behalf of the appellant to advance arguments in support of their challenge to order-in-appeal no. MKK/207/RGD-APP/2018-19 dated 30th August 2018 of Commissioner of Central Tax (Appeals), Raigad, the appeal is taken up, with the assistance of Learned […]
Solara Active Pharma Sciences Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CGST (CESTAT Mumbai) Undisputedly in the present case appellant had filed a refund claim with the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner claiming refund of Rs 8,59,420/- on 09.02.2017. The refund claim was adjudged in favour of appellants by the said authority vide order dated 05.05.2017 to the extent of […]
Airport Authority of India/ AAICLAS Vs Commissioner of Customs (AIR) (CESTAT Chennai) Brief facts are that the appellant is constituted under the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994 and was granted custodianship inter-alia of the export cargo. They have to comply with the provisions of Customs Act, 1962, Rules, Regulations and instructions issued from time […]
Learn about CESTAT Chennai’s decision on Appu Hotels Ltd.’s eligibility for exemption under Notification No.8/2003-CE for using the brand name “Le Royal Meridien
Rolex Watch Company Private Ltd Vs Commissioner of CGST & Service Tax (CESTAT Mumbai) On perusal of the contract, it is seen that there are two obligations that devolve on the appellant, viz, promotion and marketing of Rolex watches in India and undertaking repairs/replacement during the warranty period for which neither the customer nor the […]
The Vardhman Developers Vs Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) We take notice that service tax law was revamped w.e.f. 01.07.2012 by bringing in various changes. We also take notice of the TRU/CBEC letter dt. 20.02.2010 regarding the scope of valuation of taxable amount in respect of residential complex service, which was introduced […]
Bengal Beverages Private Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST & CX (CESTAT Kolkata) Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the Appellant is engaged in the manufacture and clearance of Aerated water and Fruit based drinks (in short ‘final products’) classifiable under Chapter- 22 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 on payment of […]
Luit Developers Private Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise it is trite law that figures of Form 26AS are not to be used for determining Service Tax liability unless there is proof to show that it was on account of any taxable service and relies on the order of the Tribunal in Kush […]
Voxco Pigments And Chemicals Pvt Limited Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT AHMEDABAD) There is no dispute that the appellant had filed the refund claim on 01/06/2017 for an amount of Rs. 12,25,023/-. Thereafter, on the audit query, the appellant had decided to reduce the refund claim and, therefore, withdrew the earlier claimed and thereafter claim […]
