Follow Us:

All CESTAT

Correct classification of ‘tomato dry flavour’ is CTH 3302 10 10

July 9, 2023 1539 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Chennai held that as Chapter Heading 3302 covers both natural and/or synthetic mixtures of odoriferous substances, ‘tomato dry flavour’ is correctly classifiable under CTH 3302 10 10 instead of 2106 90 60.

Services relating to construction of roads etc. to Government authorities is exemption vide notification 25/2012-ST

July 9, 2023 7044 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Ahmedabad held that services related to construction of roads etc. the Government authorities/ agencies are covered under Mega Exemption of Service Tax notification no. 25/2012-ST and hence demand unsustainable.

CENVAT credit on warranty services eligible as such service are in relation to manufacture

July 9, 2023 795 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Hyderabad held that the services provided to fulfil warranty obligation would be eligible as input services being a service in relation to manufacture. Further, also the warranty charges were included in the assessable value of goods sold to the customers.

Extended period not invocable in absence of suppression of facts with an intent to evade payment of service tax

July 9, 2023 3402 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Delhi held that extended period of limitation cannot be invoked in absence of suppression of facts with an intent to evade payment of service tax. Here, it was merely suppression of facts but intent to evade payment of service tax was absent.

Invocation of extended period not justified as there was no wilful suppression of facts

July 9, 2023 1155 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Chennai held that as the demand was raised on the basis of the books of accounts which was not hidden from the department, there was no wilful suppression or mis-statement of facts with intent to evade tax and hence invocation of extended period not justified.

Service tax not payable as mere use of word commission doesn’t mean seller has paid commission

July 9, 2023 1326 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Delhi held that mere use of the word “commission” in the clause dealing with terms of payment would not mean that “commission” was paid by the seller. The goods were sold on principal to principal basis and payment to buyer was expenses incurred by overseas buyer and not commission. Hence, service tax not payable.

Bonafide Belief Shields Appellant from Extended Period invocation for Service Tax Liability

July 9, 2023 1725 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Ahmedabad rules in Heena Enterprises Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST, activities like construction & fabrication as sub-contractor for bridges, railways, etc., not taxable under ‘Erection, Commissioning or Installation’ service, based on bona fide belief and reasonable grounds.

Demand of service tax unsustainable as Konkan & Indian Railways are not separate entities

July 8, 2023 1140 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Mumbai held that appellant i.e. Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd. and Indian Railways are not separate entities and hence demand of service tax is unsustainable.

Declared transaction value cannot be rejected without cogent reasons prescribed in Customs Valuation Rules

July 8, 2023 2076 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Ahmedabad held that the transaction value declared by the importer should form the basis of assessment unless the same is rejected, for reasons set out in Rules of Customs Valuation Rules.

Service tax not payable on construction service to Municipal Corporation under Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission

July 7, 2023 1995 Views 0 comment Print

CESTAT Ahmedabad held that services of Construction of residential complex to the Municipal Corporation of Surat under Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission which is not liable to service tax.

Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031