Explore the detailed analysis of Sh Mohammed Mustafa Vs Pr. Commissioner of Customs case by CESTAT Hyderabad. Learn why intention to smuggle can’t equate to attempt to export.
CESTAT Delhi’s ruling favors Indian Airlines Ltd, excluding freight & insurance from duty calculation for ATF consumed in aircraft fuel tanks. Full text of the order provided.
Read the detailed analysis of Hamilton Housewares Pvt Ltd Vs C.C. Ahmedabad case where CESTAT Ahmedabad allows refund of 4% SAD, despite procedural disputes.
CESTAT Chennai rules in favor of appellant, stating no service tax on flats constructed before July 2010 with less than 12 units. Full text of the order included.
CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled that freight/insurance charges aren’t part of assessable value for excise duty. Detailed analysis & conclusions provided.
Learn about Himadri Speciality Chemical Ltd. Vs Pr. Commissioner of Customs Visakhapatnam (CESTAT Hyderabad) and the implications of invoking extended limitation for IGST demand.
Delve into case of Tejal Construction vs. C.C.E. & S.T.-Surat-I as CESTAT Ahmedabad emphasizes necessity of accurate service classification for service tax demands.
Read the full text of the CESTAT Mumbai order allowing refund of service tax paid on cancelled bookings of flats by Kanakia Spaces Reality Pvt. Ltd.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that service of supply the manpower services provided to educational institutions is exempt from payment of service tax vide Sr. No. 9 of Notification No. 25/2012-ST dated 20.06.2012.
CESTAT Chennai rules printing activity by Chromaprint doesn’t constitute ‘manufacture,’ dismissing Excise Duty demand.
