Dive into the analysis of service tax exemption under section 65(105)(zzzza) for construction not primarily for commerce/industry, as seen in RBS Candiaparcar Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai).
CESTAT Ahmedabad dismisses customs duty demand on Jain Grani Marmo for excess weight in imported marble blocks, emphasizing trade practices and EOU rights.
Maersk Line India Pvt Ltd’s case on confiscated containers under Customs Notification analyzed by CESTAT Ahmedabad. Details on import, violation, and verdict.
R.S.D. Steel Industries vs Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise: CESTAT Chandigarh rules job work of cutting steel coils/plates not liable for service tax under BAS or BSS.
CESTAT Chennai allows CENVAT credit for service tax paid on broadcasting fees by Radaan Media, setting a precedent for media production companies. Read the implications.
Explore the CESTAT Bangalore’s decision on the classification of imported “Student interactive respond system,” as it delves into the applicability of Customs Tariff Chapter Note 5(E) and the implications for classification under CTH 8543.
Explore why NIDB data alone isn’t enough for value determination as CESTAT Chennai annuls penalties in Gypsie Impex vs Customs case. Full analysis here.
Learn about Lyka Labs Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST case. CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled no penalty under Excise Act when CENVAT credit paid for exempted goods.
CESTAT Chennai rules decoration balloons imported by Bubbly Balloons do not require BIS registration, setting aside the confiscation order by Customs.
CESTAT Chandigarh rules in favor of Jindal Photo Limited, allowing refund of Education Cess based on past final decisions, overruling the Unicorn Industries case.
