Analysis of the CESTAT Bangalore order in the case of DLF Southern Towns Pvt Ltd vs. Commissioner of Customs where violation of import policy led to confiscation and penalty.
Comprehensive review and implications of the CESTAT Ahmedabads decision in the Modest Infrastructure Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise case.
Detailed review and implications of CESTAT Ahmedabads judgment in the case of West Coast Pharmaceutical Works Ltd Vs C.C.E.-Ahmedabad.
Detailed analysis of the CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling on the Goodluck Empire Vs CCE & ST case involving penalties under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002.
Explore the landmark CESTAT Ahmedabad order on whether service tax is applicable to software activation charges under Business Auxiliary Service in the case of Avaya Global Connect Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST
The CESTAT Chandigarh has ruled in favor of Mankoo Machine Tools in a pivotal case on SSI exemptions. This decision clarifies that family surnames can be used across separate entities without forfeiting SSI exemptions.
CESTAT held that post facto production of certificate entitled appellant to benefits of Exemption Notification No.108/95-CE. CESTAT Cited Supreme Court decision in case of Tullow India Operations Ltd.
The recent ruling by CESTAT on Chandigarh Transport Corporation Vs Commissioner of Central Excise has declared that the collection of Adda fee by transport corporations as part of statutory functions does not amount to “Business Auxiliary Service” (BAS).
Explore the CESTAT’s recent ruling in the case of Kashmir Steel Rolling Mills vs Commissioner of Central Excise, where the tribunal upheld the rejection of the refund claim for Educational Cess due to its exclusion in the area-based exemption notification.
Learn about CESTAT’s recent ruling in the Aricent Technologies case, which validates the grant of CENVAT credit even when service-exporting premises are not registered under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules.
