In re V E Commercial Vehicles Limited (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh) Whether mounting of Bus/ Truck Body by the job worker on the chassis supplied by the principle for which the applicant charged fabrication charges including cost of certain material that was consumed during the process of job work would be classified as supply of […]
The supply, installation and fixing of furniture, customized or customized cannot be a works contract, as the items of furniture have been made or manufactured at the supplier’s place which have been installed or fixed at the place of the recipient. Such installed or fixed items of furniture can be removed/ moved to any place without damage to the furniture.
In re Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Good Governance & Policy Analysis (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh) The amount recovered by the applicant from other government departments for doing research work and study, which help them make policies or understand its impact, shall be exempt subject to satisfaction of conditions laid down under Entry No. 3 […]
In re Vippy Industries Ltd. (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh) In a revised order AAR Madhya Pradesh Held that The product Preparation of a kind used in Animal Feeding – Bio Processed Meal’ is entitled to classify under HS code 23099090 and therefore entitled to clear the said goods for specific use of Animal Feeding without […]
In re Saisanket Enterprises (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh) The judicial citations relied upon by the applicant have been duly perused and considered by us. However, we find that as per the proviso to Section 98(2) of CGST Act, the Authority shall not admit the application where the question raised in the application is already pending […]
ITC is not admissible on the goods and services received and used in the construction of warehouse used for letting out on rent as per the Section 17(5)(d) of CGST Act, 2017.
Goods supplied under a turnkey Contract, where there are multiple independent contracts, of which some are not in the nature of Works Contract, shall not be included in the value of contract in the nature of a works contract merely on account of the fact that goods are being supplied under Turnkey Contract, part of which is in the nature of a Works Contract, unless such supply of all such goods is a part of and made in the execution of a works contract.
The work entrusted to the applicant as mentioned above is covered under the article 243G of the constitution as the function entrusted to the Panchayat i.e., Rural Electrification including distribution of Electricity. However, the applicant work is not covered under Article 243W of the constitution as the function entrusted to the municipality.
Authority shall not admit the application where the question raised in the application is already decided in any proceedings in the case of an applicant.
In re Vidit Builders (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh) In the instant case what the applicant receives as their remuneration for the provision of the services or development of the land and their subsequent activities related to the sale of the plot is an amount equal to 40% of the open market value of each plot. […]
