In re Riseom Solutions Private Limited (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh) Riseom Solutions Private Limited manufactures (print) learning kit box whom they call ‘Class Monitor Home Learning Kit’. The so called learning kit is manufactured, marketed and sold by the applicant only and it is not on the basis of any specific order of anyone. Such […]
In re Kriti Industries (India) Limited (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh) Applicant believes that the product ‘sprinkler system, drip irrigation system including laterals, P.V.C. Pipes, other components and accessories’ is classified under HSN 8424 and applicable tax rate is 12%, details as per the Notification No.01/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 . The entry No. 195B […]
In re Bhopal Dugdh Sangh Sahakari Maryadit (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh) Authority is of the view that based within the meaning of Section 97 of the GST Acts, an application for Advance Ruling can only be made to determine the ‘liability to pay tax’ on any goods or services or both. The Applicant himself accepts […]
In re Dhanraj Organics Private Limited (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh) AAR ruled that Epoxidised Soya bean Oil is rightly classifiable under tariff item 1518 and GST @5% is leviable as the said product is specifically covered under the entry no.90 of Schedule-I of Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.07.2017. as amended from time to […]
AAR held that, that mere acceptance of joint custody of goods without rights, privileges of ownership of goods does not amount to supply.
AAR held that, GST is applicable on payment of notice pay by an employee to employer in lieu of notice period and telephone charges, Group Medical Insurance Policy (Policy) recovered from employees and free of cost canteen facility provided to employees. Further, Input Tax Credit (ITC) is not available with respect to canteen services provided by the employer to their employees.
In re Jaideep Ispat and Alloys Pvt Ltd. (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh) The applicant’s question whether the procedure adopted and the documents/records maintained by applicant can be deemed to be a sufficient compliance of conditions and restrictions for admissibility of input tax credit of tax paid on inward supply of local scrap and sponge iron […]
In re Sumeru Infra Solution (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh) This Authority is of the view that based on the detailed reading and understanding of Section 97 of the CGST Act, an application for Advance Ruling can only be made to determine the ‘admissibility of input tax credit (ITC)‘ on any goods or services or both. […]
In re Madhya Pradesh Power Generating Company Limited (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh) In respect of first question, regarding classification of supply in Entry No. 6 of Schedule II to the GST Act we are unable to answer the question on account of insufficient information provided by the applicant. Further in respect of first question, regarding […]
Khaitan Chemicals and Fertiliser (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh) Authority is of the view that based on the detailed reading and understanding of Section 97 of the CGST Act, an application for Advance Ruling can only be made to determine the ‘liability to pay tax’ on any goods or services or both. Therefore, no application can […]
