In re Time Technoplast Ltd (GST AAAR Karnataka) It is a settled issue that benefit under a conditional notification cannot be extended in case of non-fulfillment of conditions and/or non-compliance of procedure prescribed therein. The basic rule in interpretation of any statutory provision is that the plain words of the statute must be given effect […]
In re Workplace Options India Pvt Ltd (GST AAAR Karnataka) The Appellant has argued before us that determination of liability to pay tax on any goods or services is a matter which is well within the ambit of an advance ruling and if the said determination involves examining the place of supply, then the same […]
In re Medreich Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) AAR observed on examination of the records that the issues/questions raised by the applicant in the instant application have already been taken up by the audit team, in the case of applicant under the provisions of the CGST Act 2017. From the audit report mentioned supra it is […]
Determination of place of supply is not covered under any of the clauses (a) to (g) of Section 97(2) of the CGST Act 2017. Further, the use of term ‘shall’, is an imperative command restricting the scope of advance ruling only to the questions enumerated in the said sub-section. Thus, to answer the question relating to determination of place of supply, is beyond the scope of advance ruling. This authority, therefore, cannot answer the first question in the application.
In re Keysight Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Karnataka) The Notification No.45/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 14.11.2017 and Notification No.45/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 14.11.2017 stipulates the rate of CGST / IGST @ 5%, if the goods of computer software is supplied to public funded research institutions subject to fulfillment of the conditions prescribed under column […]
In re Cauvery Neeravari Nigama Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) The issue before us is the admissibility / maintainability of the instant application and the said admissibility is governed by the first proviso to Section 98(2) of the CGST Act, 2017, which reads as under: The Authority shall not admit the application where the question raised […]
In re Pankaj Enterprises (GST AAR Karnataka) The applicant has sought clarification about determination of taxable value of commercial immovable property for the purpose of GST liability i.e whether the sale consideration mentioned in the sale deed between builder and proposed purchaser or guidance value fixed by the state government authorities for the purpose of […]
In re AVS Tech Building Solutions India Pvt (GST AAR Karnataka) The applicant has sought advance ruling, in their application, in respect of the question ‘Whether our supply of goods – Ready Mix Concrete (HSN Code: 38245010) is covered under definition of Continuous supply of Goods under Section 2(32) of the CGST Act 2017?’ AAR […]
In re Teamlease Education Foundation (GST AAR Karnataka) a. Whether, the Applicant is acting as a pure agent of the Industry partner to the extent of reimbursement received towards stipend paid to trainees on behalf of Industry partner as part of training agreement and therefore the said reimbursement is not chargeable to GST? The Applicant […]
In re Bharatiya Reserve Bank Note Mudran Private Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) 1. Whether ITC can be claimed on common services which are utilized for both taxable as well as exempted supplies? Ans : This question is not covered under the issues referred to in Section 97(2) of the CGST Act 2017, in respect which […]
