AAR Himachal Pradesh

Advance ruling application not admittable if applicant is not supplier

In re M/s Bakson Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Himachal Pradesh)

The applicant is not engaged in the manufacture and supply of ENA presently. The representatives were asked to submit as to why the applicant is seeking advance ruling on this issue in view of the fact that advance ruling is binding only on the takpayer who has sought it. They were told that a ruling on this issue will not help the applic...

Read More

Protein Powder with Vitamins and Minerals classifiable under HS code 3004

In re M/s Newtramax Healthcare (GST AAR Himachal Pradesh)

We are of the considered opinion that all the goods being manufactured by the applicant which are mentioned (including the goods mentioned at Sr. No. 20 and 21) in the drug license issued to the applicant by the competent authority and have the labels as per the standards prescribed under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 can be classifie...

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (5,481)
Company Law (7,382)
Custom Duty (8,503)
DGFT (4,543)
Excise Duty (4,489)
Fema / RBI (4,704)
Finance (4,980)
Income Tax (37,287)
SEBI (3,989)
Service Tax (3,719)

Search Posts by Date

June 2021
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930