Charges collected under the Unparallel Health Insurance Scheme are to be considered as advance towards the provision of the health care services to the subscribers of this scheme, and accordingly, any amount collected towards this scheme will not be subjected to levy of GST
In re Tokyo Electronic Power Company Holdings INC (GST AAAR Odisha) Supplier of service M/s. Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) is located in Japan, which is non-taxable territory. The recipient of service M/s. Odisha Power Transmission Corporation Limited is located in India, which is the taxable territory and place of supply of service will be […]
AAR, Odisha objected that in addition to procedural part, there should be specific job work agreement and job work charges should be clearly mentioned and raised in their invoices.
In re Magnetic Infotech Pvt Ltd. (GST AAAR Telangana) Exemption not available to sub-contractor on services provided to educational institutions on behalf of main contractor The AAAR, Telangana in the matter of M/s Magnetic Infotech Private Limited [Order-in-Appeal No. AAAR/13/2022 dated November 22, 2022] has ruled that the sub-contractor is not entitled to claim Goods […]
AAAR upheld the ruling passed by AAR of not providing the benefit of exemption under entry no. 3 of the Notification 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated June 28, 2017 wherein the payment was made for medical insurance premium for employees, pensioners, and their family members.
In re Sivantos India Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAAR Karnataka) AAAR held that Since the parts and accessories of hearing aids falling under tariff item 9021 90 10 are not specifically mentioned in any of the entries of the exemption notification No 02/2017 Central Tax (Rate) and are also not specifically mentioned in either Schedule I, […]
AAAR set aside order of AAR for failure in giving a ruling on question of taxability under GST on services provided by assessee on the grounds that it involves determination of place of supply which is beyond its jurisdiction. Held that, the AAR was incorrect for failing to make a ruling on the matter. Further, remanded back the case to the AAR for fresh consideration.
In re Narsimha Reddy & Sons (GST AAAR Telangana) Appellants are in the business of production and sale of agricultural seeds. In the process of production, the applicant outsources certain services such as cleaning, drying, grading and packing to the job workers and stores the seeds in various facilities after processing them. In the process […]
The execution of works contract service for construction of residential quarters exclusively meant for the employees of NPCIL at Anuvijay township by the appellant is covered under entry Sl.No.3(vi) of Notification 11/2017-CT-Rate dt. 28.06.2017 and the corresponding SGST Notification for the period upto 31.12.2021.
In re Continental Engineering Corporation (GST AAAR Telangana) Whether GST payable on the claim of Rs. 2,20,00,000/- for the HGCL share of sitting fee and other expenses paid by the applicant on the directions of the Arbitrators for an amount 1. On this count, the lower authority had held that Arbitration as service was supplied […]
