Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ajay Kumar Radheshyam Goenka Vs Tourism Finance Corporation Of India Ltd (Supreme Court of India)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ajay Kumar Radheshyam Goenka Vs Tourism Finance Corporation Of India Ltd (Supreme Court) SC held that where the proceedings under Section 138 of the NI Act had already commenced with the Magistrate taking cognizance upon the complaint and during the pendency, the company gets dissolved, the signatories/directors cannot escape from their penal liability under Section 138 of the NI Act by citing its dissolution. What is dissolved, is only the company, not the per­sonal penal liability of the accused covered under Section 141 of the NI Act. Hon’ble SC held as under (a) After passing of the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930