Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s. Ginni Garments and anr. Vs M/s Sethi Garments (Punjab & Haryana High Court)
Appeal Number : CRR No.9872-2018(O&M)
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/04/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

M/s. Ginni Garments and anr. Vs M/s Sethi Garments (Punjab & Haryana High Court)

Conclusion –

If the provisions are substantive in nature then the same cannot be applied Retrospectively to the pending cases. However, if the provisions are procedural in nature then the same has to be applied to all the cases, including the one pending before the Court.

Section 143A is substantive and hence effective prospectively, whereas, section 148 is procedural in nature hence effective retrospectively to the pending cases.

Facts –

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031