This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No responsibility or liability persists if exemption been granted through Government MoU
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Canara Bank Vs Piyush Tripathi & 4 Ors. (NCDRC Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- NCDRC/SCDRC
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Canara Bank Vs Piyush Tripathi (NCDRC Delhi)
Conclusion: In present facts of the case, NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI (NCDRC) observed that when Government of India had itself exempted the Petitioner from any obligation to verify the Interest Subsidy Schemes received from any Bank other than the Petitioner/Bank itself then the Petitioner cannot be hold responsible.
Facts: In present facts of the case, the present Revision Petition under Section 21 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 was filed by against the impugned Order dated 29.09.2021 passed by the ...
Author Info
