This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Once a resolution plan is approved, Substitution of same is not permissible
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- UV Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. & Anr. Vs Aircel Ltd. Through Its Monitoring Committee (NCLAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- NCLAT
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
UV Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. & Anr. Vs Aircel Ltd. Through Its Monitoring Committee (NCLAT Delhi)
The recent judgment by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in the case of UV Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. & Anr. vs Aircel Ltd. highlights a crucial aspect of resolution proceedings. It addresses the issue of substitution of a Resolution Applicant (RA) after the approval of a resolution plan by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).
The appellants, UV Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. & Anr., sought s...
Author Info
