Presumptive inference provided by Informant cannot be basis for forming a prima facie opinion

Ravi Pal Vs All India Sugar Trade Association (AISTA) (CCI)

After appreciation of the allegations of the Informant and documents submitted including the oral submissions made by the Informant, the Commission is of the view that no evidence has been provided by the Informant to show that there was any meeting of minds between the OPs to establish correlation between bids submitted in any specific tender with the alleged sugar prices circulated over the WhatsApp group. Presumptive inference and analysis provided by the

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.