This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Partners liable to prosecuted u/s. 278B if there are specific averments in complaint that they were responsible for every act or act of omission and commission of the firm at the time when offence was committed
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Deepak Engineering Works and Others Vs CIT and Others (Patna High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Patna High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Deepak Engineering Works and Others Vs CIT and Others
High Court of Patna
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 22099 of 1998
Rakesh Kumar, J
Decided on: 19 February 2011
Judgement
The present petition has been filed under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on behalf of petitioner no. 1 i.e. an unregistered firm (U.R.F.) and petitioner nos. 2 to 4 in the capacity of the partner of petitioner no. 1 with a prayer to quash entire criminal proceeding vide Complaint Case No. 47(C) of 1992/569 of 1993 pending before the Special Court of Economic Offences at Patna Civil Court, Patna which was tr...
