Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Chief Executive Officer Vs K.V. Puttaraju (Karnataka High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition No. 46017/2017 (L-PG)
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/05/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Chief Executive Officer Vs K.V. Puttaraju (Karnataka High Court)

Conclusion: High Court favoured an order passed by the Controlling Authority/ Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, which directed government bodies to pay gratuity amount claimed by former employees from the time they were employed as daily wage earners till their employment was regularised.

Held: Appeallant were the Government bodies being part of the Department of Panchayat Raj. Respondent were initially employed as daily wage workers. The Government by its order regularized the services of respondent with certain cut off dates. Respondent retired from the services on receiving their pension amounts and gratuity. After such retirement, they submitted the applications before the Controlling Authority claiming that they were entitled to gratuity from the date of their induction as daily wage workers. The main ground of challenge was that respondent were not the employees within the meaning of Section 2(e), therefore the petutions were not maintainable. It was contended that the impugned orders were without jurisdiction and liable to be quashed. It was held that admittedly the government paid gratuity only covering the period from the date of their regularisation till their retirement on attaining superannuation. While paying gratuity, the government did not take into consideration the services rendered by respondent from the date of their appointment as daily wage workers till the date of their regularisation. During that period, respondent was not governed by the KCSR or for any other rules for payment of gratuity. The petitions were partly allowed. The impugned orders regarding payment of gratuity were confirmed. The petitioners were jointly and severally liable to pay the gratuity amount to respondent with interest thereon at 10% per annum from the date of the applications till the date of deposit.

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

The above petitions are filed seeking quashing of the orders of the Controlling Authority/ Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (‘the Act’ for short) awarding gratuity amount claimed by respondent No.1 with interest at 10% per annum.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031