CIDCO can decide technical qualification of bidder based on opinion of MSETCL

Universal Cables Ltd Vs State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court) Conclusion: CIDCO were the best judge to consider compliance with technical and financial conditions. MSETCL was consulted by CIDCO, both on account of the fact that the project had been undertaken by CIDCO on behalf of MSETCL as well as the execution of the same under the supervision of MSETCL. Therefore, the order of CIDCO was upheld in holding BNC to be technically qualified. Held: CIDCO proposed to free up some space occupied by overhead power corridor of Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Company Ltd. (MSETCL) in Kha...