This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
CIDCO can decide technical qualification of bidder based on opinion of MSETCL
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Universal Cables Ltd Vs State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Bombay High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Universal Cables Ltd Vs State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court)
Conclusion: CIDCO were the best judge to consider compliance with technical and financial conditions. MSETCL was consulted by CIDCO, both on account of the fact that the project had been undertaken by CIDCO on behalf of MSETCL as well as the execution of the same under the supervision of MSETCL. Therefore, the order of CIDCO was upheld in holding BNC to be technically qualified.
Held: CIDCO proposed to free up some space occupied by overhead power corridor of Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Company Ltd. (MSETCL) in Kha...
Author Info
