Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Aurobindo Pharam Limited Vs NYK Theseus (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Interim Application No. 540 of 2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/06/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Aurobindo Pharam Limited Vs NYK Theseus (Bombay High Court)

Bombay High Court in the case of Aurobindo Pharam Limited Vs NYK Theseus delves into the distinction between commonality or common ownership and the requirement of deceit or fraud to invoke the concept of “lifting the corporate veil” and establishing an “alter ego.”

The court analyzes previous judgments and legal principles related to corporate law, emphasizing that each company is considered a separate legal entity. Mere commonality in ownership, directorship, or interlocking shareholding does not automatically establish one entity as the alter ego of another. The court further explores the necessity of fraud or deceit to justify piercing the corporate veil and disregarding the separate legal identities of multiple companies.

High court held that mere commonality in ownership or interlocking shareholding is insufficient to disregard the separate legal identities of multiple companies.

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031