Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ashok Mahindru Vs Vivek Parti (NCLAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : NCLAT
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ashok Mahindru Vs Vivek Parti (NCLAT Delhi) NCLAT Delhi held that Section 96(1)(b) of I&B Code cannot be read to mean that any future liability or obligation is contemplated to be stayed. Thus, stay of proceedings under Section 19(2) and Section 66-67 is not contemplated under Section 96(1)(b) Facts- Proceedings were initiated u/s. 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (I&B Code) by order dated 05.09.2019 against the Corporate Debtor – ‘Advance Home and Personal Care Ltd.’. In the proceedings u/s. 9, an application was filed by the IRP under Section 19 sub-section (2)...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930