This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
CLB can allow amendment to petition filed u/s. 397 & 398, if it isn’t prejudicial to parties
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Gharda Chemicals Ltd. Vs Jer Rutton Kavasmanek (Bombay High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Bombay High Court
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Gharda Chemicals Ltd.
Versus
Jer Rutton Kavasmanek
CO. APPEAL (L) NO. 45 OF 2012
CLB CO. APPLICATION NO. 73 OF 2012
CLB CO. PETITION NO. 87 OF 2010
DECEMBER 20, 2012
JUDGMENT
1. Admit.
2. By consent of the parties, the present appeal was heard finally at the admission stage and is disposed of finally by this judgment.
3. This appeal filed under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 is directed against the order dated 13th August, 2012 passed by the Company Law Board, Western Region Bench, Mumbai in Company Application No. 73 of 2012 in Company Petition No. 87 of 2010 whic...
