Accounting for Interim Financial Reporting under AS 25 and Ind AS 34 – A Comprehensive Professional Analysis
1. Introduction
Interim financial reporting is one of the most significant developments in the evolution of corporate financial transparency.
It bridges the gap between annual reports and the stakeholders’ constant need for up-to-date financial information. For stakeholders such as investors, analysts, lenders, and regulators, quarterly and half-yearly data are vital in assessing the financial health and operational efficiency of a business.
In India, the requirements for interim reporting differ depending on whether a company follows the traditional Accounting Standards or the Ind AS framework.
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has issued Accounting Standard (AS) 25 – Interim Financial Reporting – for entities not required to follow Ind AS.
For Ind AS-compliant entities, the corresponding standard is Ind AS 34, which is substantially aligned with International Accounting Standard (IAS) 34.
While their objectives are similar, there are subtle but important differences in recognition, measurement, and disclosure requirements that Chartered Accountants must master to ensure compliance and quality reporting.
2. Regulatory Context in India
The Indian corporate regulatory landscape has been significantly shaped by SEBI’s Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements (LODR) Regulations, 2015, which make quarterly financial reporting mandatory for all listed companies.
In addition, certain large unlisted public companies and companies with specific loan covenants also prepare interim financial reports, often at the request of banks, investors, or joint venture partners.
Key aspects of the regulatory context include:
– **SEBI LODR**: Mandatory publication of quarterly results within 45 days of quarter-end (except the last quarter, which aligns with annual results).
– **Companies Act, 2013**: While it does not specifically mandate interim reporting, the requirement for the Board to approve financial statements extends to interim statements where applicable.
– **Banking Sector**: RBI requires banks and NBFCs to prepare quarterly financial statements for regulatory filings.
This dual compliance framework means that Chartered Accountants often work with both AS 25 and Ind AS 34, depending on the nature of the client.
3. Fundamental Accounting Concepts Embedded in AS 25 and Ind AS 34
Several core accounting concepts underlie the preparation of interim financial statements, which ensure that such reports are consistent, comparable, and reliable.
1. **Accrual Concept** – Transactions are recorded when they occur, not when cash is received or paid. Interim periods are no exception.
2. **Consistency of Accounting Policies** – Both AS 25 and Ind AS 34 require that the same accounting policies be applied in interim and annual statements to ensure comparability.
3. **Materiality** – An item material in the context of interim results may not be material annually; hence, materiality is judged with reference to the interim period.
4. **Periodicity** – The integral view adopted treats interim periods as part of the whole financial year rather than as discrete periods.
5. **Prudence** – Estimates at interim dates should be made cautiously to avoid overstatement of assets or income.
6. **Going Concern** – The assumption that the entity will continue in operation for the foreseeable future is equally applicable in interim reporting.
4. Recognition and Measurement Principles
Both AS 25 and Ind AS 34 stipulate that the recognition and measurement of items in interim financial statements should be based on the same principles as used in the annual financial statements.
However, estimates play a much larger role in interim reporting. For example:
– **Tax expense** is based on the estimated annual effective tax rate applied to the pre-tax income of the interim period.
– **Seasonal revenues** may require estimation of cost allocations for accurate margin reporting.
– **Provisions** are recognized when the liability arises, even if it results in quarterly volatility.
The integral approach means that certain costs (such as depreciation) are allocated evenly, while others (such as bonuses) may be accrued progressively over the year.
5. Comparative Analysis – AS 25 vs Ind AS 34
While both standards aim to provide timely and reliable interim information, there are notable differences:
– **Presentation**: AS 25 mandates presentation of a balance sheet, statement of profit and loss, and cash flow statement; Ind AS 34 additionally requires a statement of changes in equity.
– **Segment Reporting**: Under Ind AS 34, segment disclosures are mandatory if Ind AS 108 applies; AS 25 encourages but does not mandate them.
– **Impairment**: Ind AS 34 allows reversal of certain impairment losses (except goodwill), whereas AS 25 is silent.
– **Disclosures**: Ind AS 34 prescribes more extensive disclosures, including fair value changes, contingencies, and related party transactions.
6. Corporate Case Studies and Illustrations
**Case Study 1 – Infosys Ltd. (Q2 FY 2023–24)**
– **Context**: Ind AS 34 reporting for a global IT services company with significant foreign operations.
– **Challenge**: Volatile foreign exchange rates affecting revenue recognition and OCI.
– **Approach**: OCI adjustments made for currency translation differences, with interim tax calculated using annual ETR.
**Case Study 2 – Tata Motors Ltd. (Q1 FY 2022–23)**
– **Context**: Seasonality in passenger vehicle sales.
– **Challenge**: Allocation of fixed costs and promotional expenses.
– **Approach**: Fixed costs allocated on annual production basis; promotional costs expensed in the quarter incurred.
**Case Study 3 – HDFC Bank Ltd. (Q4 FY 2021–22)**
– **Context**: Large provision for NPAs recognized in one quarter.
– **Challenge**: Determination of period in which provision should be recognized.
– **Approach**: Provision recognized when obligating event occurred, not spread over the year.
7. Numeric Example – Interim Tax Allocation
A company expects an annual profit before tax (PBT) of ₹1,200 lakh with an annual ETR of 30%.
– Q1 PBT = ₹200 lakh → Tax = ₹60 lakh
– Q2 PBT = ₹150 lakh → Tax = ₹45 lakh
– Q3 Loss = ₹50 lakh → Tax credit applied using annualized approach.
This method ensures that tax expense is matched appropriately over the year.
8. Special Considerations in Interim Reporting
– **Impairment Testing**: Required if indicators exist; reversals permitted under Ind AS 34 except for goodwill.
– **Contingent Liabilities**: Significant changes since year-end must be disclosed.
– **Fair Value Adjustments**: Interim recognition of changes in fair value of financial instruments is mandatory for certain sectors.
9. Challenges and Best Practices
Challenges include estimation uncertainty, seasonality effects, result volatility, and disclosure overload.
Best practices involve:
– Maintaining rolling forecasts.
– Providing management commentary for context.
– Ensuring alignment of segment reporting with investor expectations.
– Establishing robust internal controls over interim closing processes.
10. Conclusion
Interim financial reporting under AS 25 and Ind AS 34 is a sophisticated area that demands precision, professional judgement, and a deep understanding of accounting concepts.
For Chartered Accountants, mastering these standards ensures that interim reports not only meet compliance requirements but also serve as a powerful tool for transparent communication with stakeholders.
Author Bio
