Get all latest income tax news, act, article, notification, circulars, instructions, slab on Taxguru.in. Check out excel calculators budget 2017 ITR, black money, tax saving tips, deductions, tax audit on income tax.
Income Tax : Representation urges notification, rules, forms and e-filing facility for FAST-DS under the Finance Act, 2026, along with clarific...
Income Tax : Article explains possible tax treatment of crypto perpetual futures, comparing Sections 43(5), 73 and 115BBH, turnover, valuation ...
Income Tax : ITAT Special Bench held that omission of scrutiny category in a Section 143(2) notice is a procedural defect curable under Section...
Income Tax : A fake email titled Tax Authority Checklist for July 2026 is targeting taxpayers by impersonating the Ministry of Finance and the ...
Income Tax : ITAT held section 35D(2)(c) applies only to companies and upheld disallowance of REIT's claim for IPO and listing expense amortisa...
Income Tax : Finance Ministry reports LTCG tax revenue, clarifies FPI Government Securities tax exemption from 1 April 2026, and says no LTCG r...
Income Tax : Finance Ministry says no proposal exists to scrap LTCG tax and outlines SEBI investor awareness, grievance redressal and market pr...
Income Tax : Finance Ministry says Section 43B(h) allows deduction for dues to micro and small enterprises only on actual payment beyond the 45...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored the appeal after holding that mere upload of an order on the ITBA portal is not valid service under Sectio...
Income Tax : Direct tax collections as on 13 July 2026 show 16.11% growth in gross collections and 16.40% growth in net collections over the pr...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi deleted the section 69A addition of ₹33.50 lakh after holding the intercepted cash formed part of the disclosed prope...
Income Tax : Bombay HC declined to entertain Revenue's depreciation challenge and remanded the matter to ITAT only to decide the deferred maint...
Income Tax : Bombay HC dismissed Revenue's appeal, holding the Section 263 issue in unabated search assessments was covered by Abhisar Buildwel...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi deleted Section 270A penalty as notices lacked specific Section 270A(9) charge and the expenditure claim involved a deb...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored six Section 153A search assessment appeals to the AO, subject to ₹50,000 cost per appeal for repeated no...
Income Tax : CBDT Notification No. 94/2026 amends Rule 157 of the Income-tax Rules, 2026 by revising the definition of “specified fund” wit...
Income Tax : CBDT Notification No. 93/2026 grants Schedule III read with Section 11 exemption to District Legal Service Authority, Jind for tax...
Income Tax : CBDT Notification No. 92/2026 grants Section 10(46) exemption to District Legal Service Authority, Jind, subject to specified cond...
Income Tax : CBDT Notification No. 91/2026 notifies NPCIL's capital asset transfer to ASHVINI under section 47(viiaf), applicable for FY 2025-2...
Income Tax : CBDT approves IIIT Dharwad for scientific research under Section 45 of the Income-tax Act, 2025, subject to Rules 31, 32 and 34 co...
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 295, of the INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Revenue hereby makes the following rules to amend the INCOME-TAX RULES, 1962, namely :—
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-clause (iii) of clause 44 of section 2 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby authorises every Gazetted Officer of the Government of Orissa, appointed to perform the functions of a Certificate-Officer under clause (3) of section 3 of the Bihar and Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914 (Bihar and Orissa Act IV of 1914), to exercise the powers of a Tax Recovery Officer under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-clause (iii) of clause 44 of section 2 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby authorises every Gazetted Officer of the Government of Bihar, appointed to perform the functions of a Certificate Officer under clause (3) of section 3 of the Bihar and Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act,
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (iii) of clause (44) of section 2 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby authorises every Gazetted Officer of the Government of West Bengal appointed to perform the functions of a Certificate-Officer under clause (3) of section 3 of the Bengal Public Demands Recovery Act, 1913 (Bengal Act III of 1913), to exercise the powers of a Tax Recovery Officer under the Income-tax Act, 1961
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-clause (iv) of clause (23C) of section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby notifies Bharatiya Bhasha Parishad, Calcutta, for the purpose of the said sub-clause for the assessment years 1990-91 to 1992-93 subject to the following conditions, namely
It is hereby notified for general information that the institution mentioned below has been approved by the Secretary, Department of Science & Technology, New Delhi, the prescribed authority for the purposes of clause (ii) of sub-section (1) of section 35 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, read with rule 6(iv) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, under the category of “Association” in the area of other natural and applied sciences, subject to the following conditions :—
In a civil suit the respondent obtained a decree against his employer the appellant company for a sum which included com- pensation for wrongful termination of his service, arrears of salary, interest and costs of the suit, and then applied for execution of the decree.
Y. Narayana Chetty Vs. ITO (Supreme Court) The notice prescribed by section 148 cannot be regarded as a mere procedural requirement. It is only if the said notice is served on the assessee that the ITO would be justified in taking proceedings against the assessee. If no notice is issued or if the notice issued is shown to be invalid, then the proceedings taken by the ITO would be illegal and void – Y. Narayana Chetty v. ITO [1959] 35 ITR 388 (SC); CIT v. Thayaballi Mulla Jeevaji Kapasi [1967] 66 ITR 147 (SC); CIT v. Kurban Hussain Ibrahimji Mithiborwala [1971] 82 ITR 821 (SC).
Held, that the Income-tax Officer was justified in exercising his powers under s. 35 and rectifying the mistake. As a result of, the legal fiction about the retrospective operation of the Amendment Act, the subsequently inserted proviso must be read as.
The question arising for consideration both in the reference under section 66(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act as well as in W.P. No. 925 of 1955 are identical and relate to the proper rule to be applied for determining the amortisation of films for computing the income, profits and gains of the assessee which is carrying on business as a film distributor. The assessee in the Reference Case No. 27 of 1955 is the petitioner in the writ petition.
