Excise Duty Act, Rules Articles News Notification Circulars Instructions. Input Credit, Cenvat, Duty Rate, SSI Exemption, Excise on Jewellery,Excise on Garment
Excise Duty : The Court held that duty-paid items supplied directly to site are not includible when the final plant is immovable. The key takeaw...
Excise Duty : Discover how the Central Excise (Amendment) Act, 2025 revamps tobacco taxation, introducing steep excise duties on cigarettes, che...
Excise Duty : CESTAT remands Kohler India case, stating Supreme Court's Safari Retreats judgment under CGST cannot be mechanically applied to CE...
Excise Duty : Freight and insurance charges are includable in Central Excise assessable value for FOR destination sales where the buyer's premis...
Excise Duty : The Supreme Court upholds CENVAT credit for telecom infrastructure, ruling in favor of telecom operators on towers and shelters....
Excise Duty : The FAQs clarify how excise duty on chewing tobacco, jarda, and gutkha will be levied based on packing machine capacity rather tha...
Excise Duty : CESTAT issues instructions for e-filing appeals, detailing registration, filing process, documents, fees, and compliance with Proc...
Excise Duty : Govt clarifies tax increase on tobacco products, citing changes in excise duty on cigarettes and GST rules. Revenue funds overall ...
Excise Duty : Supreme Court admits Ecoboard Industries Ltd.'s appeal on excise duty for intermediate products, questioning Tribunal's duty impo...
Excise Duty : Key changes in excise duty and Clean Environment Cess under Finance (No. 2) Bill, 2024, including extended deadlines and exemption...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Allahabad held that finding recorded by Commissioner (A) in earlier round of litigation have attained finality. Accordingly...
Excise Duty : Gujarat High Court held that the services received in respect of setting up the captive wind mill plant are eligible for the Cenva...
Excise Duty : The Court held that electrically operated golf carts were exempt from Infrastructure Cess under the applicable notification. Re-as...
Excise Duty : CESTAT held that valuation under Rule 10A fails where the department cannot prove that goods were manufactured as job work, reaffi...
Excise Duty : The Bombay High Court held that delays caused by genuine technical glitches do not invalidate SVLDRS benefits, distinguishing case...
Excise Duty : New monthly excise duty rates link retail sale price and packing machine speed for chewing tobacco, jarda and gutkha to strengthen...
Excise Duty : The notification supersedes earlier exemptions and caps excise duty at revised rates for a wide range of tobacco products, effecti...
Excise Duty : The notification removes ambiguity by substituting pan masala containing tobacco with gutkha for excise assessment....
Excise Duty : New rules tax chewing tobacco, gutkha and jarda by packing-machine capacity and RSP, mandating declarations, CCTV and upfront duty...
Excise Duty : Chewing tobacco, jarda and gutkha packed by machines are notified for excise duty under a special valuation mechanism in public in...
CESTAT Hyderabad held that CENVAT Credit on inputs used for fabrication of capital goods like pollution control equipment, heating furnace, casting machine, coating machine, chimney, rolling machine, reheating machine, control panel, etc. is eligible.
Read the full text of the CESTAT Delhi order on Agarwal Aluminiums vs. Commissioner, where area-based excise duty exemption was denied due to production date.
Bombay High Court held that services in the nature of ‘Veterinary Services’ and ‘Technical and Laboratory Testing Services’ did not fall under taxable category of Business Auxiliary Services.
CESTAT Mumbai held that Rule 14 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 (CCR, 2004) can only be made applicable against the manufacturer/service provider or the person who availed the allegedly inadmissible credit and accordingly recovery of CENVAT Credit against Input Service Distributor unsustainable.
Learn about CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling on Cenvat credit for construction services in case of General Motors India. Analysis and implications explained.
Explore Bodal Chemicals Ltd vs. C.C.E. & S.T. case where CESTAT Ahmedabad remands matter pending a Supreme Court decision on Cenvat credit for exempted goods.
CESTAT Ahmedabad’s ruling on excise duty for physician samples sold to dealers for free distribution to doctors. Analysis of Sun Pharmaceuticals vs. C.C.E. & S.T.-Vadodara-ii case.
CESTAT Kolkata sets aside demand of proportionate Cenvat Credit as the assessee reverses it with interest. Explore the full text of the CESTAT Kolkata order.
Bombay High Court quashes a 25-year-old show cause notice, citing delay and lost records, allowing refund with interest in EPL Ltd. vs. Union of India case.
CESTAT Mumbai held that once the duty on final products has been accepted by the department, CENVAT credit availed need not be reversed even if the activity docs not amount to manufacture.
