Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : B. Anand Babu Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
B. Anand Babu Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai) Penalty u/s 271D Quashed as Time-Barred under Section 275(1)(c) The Hon’ble ITAT, Chennai held that the impugned penalty orders passed u/s 271D for AYs 2016-17, 2017-18 and 2019-20 were vitiated and barred by limitation under Section 275(1)(c) of the Act. The Tribunal noted that no assessment proceedings were framed, and therefore the first limb of Section 275(1)(c) was not applicable. In the absence of assessment, the date of initiation of penalty proceedings was held to be 21.04.2022, being the date on which the AO made a reference to the Addl./JCIT. Co...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Experienced professional with over 3 years of Post qualification experience in handling Assessments, dealing CIT(A) and ITAT Appeals. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Central Circle Not Exempt from Faceless Reassessment Regime: ITAT Hyderabad Appeal Dismissal for Non-Prosecution Invalid When Notices Sent to Wrong Email Address Telangana HC Quashes Section 148 Unsigned Reassessment Notice ITAT Hyderabad Dropped Penalties When Compliance Made Before Assessment Ends ₹3.49 Cr Cash Seizure Backed by Cash Book & Debtor Realisations: ITAT Deletes Sec 69A Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031