Delhi High Court directs refund of amount deposited involuntarily during search proceedings, emphasizing the lack of coercion and the need for statutory compliance.
In Bharat Agro Industries Vs DCIT, New Delhi ITAT questions the logic of treating sales as bogus when purchases are genuine and stock is accepted.
New Delhi ITAT explains that Explanation 3 to Sec 147 can’t justify additions unrelated to reasons for reopening. Read the detailed analysis.
Indore ITAT clarifies that a firm can’t deny land ownership if bought through directors. Read the detailed analysis of Bagora Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT case.
ITAT Delhi directs deletion of derivative loss addition, ruling that proper banking channel payments were made. Details of the case explained here.
Armasol Properties Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO (ITAT Kolkata) case analysis. ITAT allows expenses under section 24(a) of Income Tax Act. Detailed article on the ruling and its implications.
Mumbai ITAT ruling in Canara Bank vs. ACIT case clarifies TDS liability when taxpayer unaware of subsequent TDS certificate. Detailed analysis & implications.
Chennai ITAT’s ruling in Bharat Engineering Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT clarifies eligibility for Sec 80IA deduction based on the nature of work executed. Detailed analysis provided.
Delve into Veneer Mills vs Commissioner of Customs case dissected by CESTAT Chennai, affirming SAD refund despite certificate dispute, with expert insights.
Dive into the case of Pravinbhai Mumabhai Bharwad vs ITO as ITAT Ahmedabad annuls addition under section 69A, highlighting oversight of cash deposit proofs by AO and CIT(A).
