Madras High Court rules draft assessment order must be treated as show cause notice due to lack of opportunity to respond. This decision protects taxpayer rights and ensures fair tax assessments in India.
Madras High Court ruled that the Tax Recovery Officer (TRO) cannot declare a property sale made by an assessee to a third party as void, even if the sale occurred during tax proceedings. This decision protects the rights of third-party buyers in tax disputes.
The Supreme Court will soon hear the matter regarding sales tax demand for the use of invalid ST-1 Forms. Get updates on this crucial case.
Explore how the Allahabad High Court nullified the Commercial Tax Tribunal’s decision due to non-compliance with Rule 63(5) of U.P. V.A.T. Rules, 2008. Details in the article.
Explore the Delhi High Court’s judgment in Apshara Garments Pvt. Ltd Vs Commissioner of Delhi Goods And Service Tax & Anr. regarding retrospective GST registration cancellation and restoration.
Read the Kerala High Court judgment in Anand Madhavan Nair Indiradevi Vs State Tax Officer. Understand the dismissal of the writ petition and availability of statutory remedy under the CGST Act.
Explore the Allahabad High Court judgment in Mansoori Enterprises Vs U.O.I. Understand the jurisdictional limit of GST & Central Excise Superintendent for orders exceeding Rs.10,00,000.
CESTAT clarifies service tax demands cannot be based solely on ITR or 26AS statements. The department must prove service provision, recipient, and consideration. This decision upholds consistent rulings and protects businesses from unsubstantiated demands.
CESTAT Chennai rules redemption fine cannot exceed market value in Vinayaga Traders vs Commissioner of Customs case, setting precedent for import disputes.
Discover why the AAR cannot issue rulings on matters outside CGST Act 2017, Section 97(2), through the case of Srinivasa Constructions India Pvt. Ltd.
