Discover why AIIMS Bibinagar cannot claim GST exemptions on pure services from vendors following a GST AAR Telangana ruling.
Chandigarh ITAT allows additional evidence in assessments under section 144, ensuring fair taxpayer treatment and legal compliance.
Rajkot ITAT confirms gross profit estimation and stock addition for Raghuvanshi Cotton Ginning, highlighting the importance of accurate stock reporting.
Mumbai ITAT decision clarifies that no addition under Section 69 I-T Act is justified once the source of investment is proven, setting a precedent.
Mumbai ITAT reiterates Sec 50C(1) as a measure against tax evasion by undervaluing property sales, emphasizing its retrospective application.
Explore ITAT Mumbai’s interpretation on Section 80P(2)(d) deductions for Co-Op Societies on interest income from co-op banks, setting a precedent for future tax assessments.
In the case of Reliance Power Ltd vs. DCIT, Mumbai ITAT’s ruling clarifies disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing that investments yielding exempt income should be considered for disallowance.
In the case of Rajesh Lakhmshi Nisar Vs ITO, Mumbai ITAT admitted additional evidence, emphasizing taxpayers shouldn’t be penalized for not submitting material evidence.
Delve into ITAT Delhi’s verdict on ACIT vs Noida Cyber Park Pvt. Ltd., emphasizing the need for fair market value assessment in Section 40A(2)(a) disallowances and rejecting arbitrary ad hoc deductions.
In the case of DCIT Vs Aarya Developers, ITAT Ahmedabad rules on the addition of on-money in the sale of house property, emphasizing the need for proper evidence and expert valuation.
