Discover the Bombay High Court’s ruling in the case of Netcore Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India & Ors., where the rejection order of a refund claim was set aside due to procedural irregularities.
The CESTAT Mumbai allows the appeal in the case of Reliable Automotive Private Limited versus Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, setting aside demands and penalties. Get insights into the legal proceedings and conclusions.
The appellant, in a recent case involving the supply of crude oil/gas to ONGC, failed to meet the stipulated event for service completion. Consequently, the obligation to pay service tax was deemed non-applicable.
Explore the Kerala High Court directive to GSTN regarding refund claims, errors rectification, and implications for petitioners. Detailed analysis and outcome included.
Read how Allahabad High Court set aside entry tax orders against United Spirits Limited, citing jurisdictional issues with the UP Entry Tax Act. Analysis and implications explained.
Learn how ITAT Mumbai overturned a decision to disallow excessive commission paid by Srinathji Yamunaji Enterprises, citing lack of evidence and business necessity.
Get insights into the Hindustan Construction Company Limited vs Union of India case in the Himachal Pradesh High Court. Learn about the stay of recovery proceedings and the court’s reliance on ASMT 10 and precedent.
CESTAT Kolkata sets aside orders and allows appeals in Nalco Water India Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST & Excise, Howrah case, holding distribution of input service credit on a pro rata basis valid.
Explore the significance of order communication in appeals provision, as clarified by CESTAT Ahmedabad in Ashapura Minechem Ltd. Vs C.C.-Jamnagar case, setting aside rejection orders.
Dive into the analysis of service tax exemption under section 65(105)(zzzza) for construction not primarily for commerce/industry, as seen in RBS Candiaparcar Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai).
