High Court of Gauhati, after examining detailed submissions, directs DGGI to produce original records in the court for inspection of the court to ascertain whether there was ‘reason to believe’ or was it a mere pretence.
A landmark judgment by Supreme Court of India emphasizing importance of prompt adjudication in show cause notices, as seen in ATA Freight Line Vs Union of India case.
Explore the detailed analysis of United Spirit Limited’s legal battle against entry tax in Uttar Pradesh. Allahabad High Court grants stay, citing jurisdiction issues. Know the background and judgment.
Vodafone Idea Limited vs. Union of India case: Karnataka High Court remands matter to assessing officer for considering C Forms, affected by COVID-19.
AL Hatim Tours And Travels Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (Delhi High Court) The petitioners are private Haj Operators (HGO). They arrange tours to the holy shrines of Mecca/Madina in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The Government of India has an agreement with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, per which, quotas are allotted to India […]
Bombay High court held that SVLDR scheme is a dispute resolution scheme. The substantive benefit under the scheme cannot be denied for technical reasons.
Issuance of corporate guarantee to a group company without consideration would not fall within banking and other financial services and is therefore not taxable service.
Petitioner approached HC against order passed by appellate authority as GST Tribunal has not been constituted till date. Revenue contended that writ petition should not be admitted in wake of alternate remedy.
Chandra Developers Private Limited Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court) Whether the commissioner could issue show cause notice when the discharge certificate has not been withdrawn by the designated committee, the enquiry was not initiated prior to 30.06.2019 (cut off date). The Hon’ble High Court of Bombay. The petitioner was a service provider. It […]
HC observed that against judgment of High Court of Delhi in case of Amadeus India Pvt. Ltd., appeal is pending before Supreme Court solely on the point of limitation. Thus, prima facie, Revenue has impliedly conceded that pre-consultation is mandatory.
