The primary function of the Auditor in the present case was to ensure compliance with SAs to achieve the necessary audit quality to lend credibility to financial statements and facilitate its users. A critical, questioning attitude, an unwillingness to be satisfied by superficial explanations, not concluding on material matters without rigorous verification, diligent and methodical […]
Smt. Rakhi Singh Vs State of U.P (District Court of Varanasi) In Gyanvapi case court rejected the Muslim side’s petition and said the suit is maintainable. The next hearing of the case is on Sep 22. Court held that suit of the plaintiffs is not barred by the Uttar Pradesh Sri Kashi Vishwanath Temple Act, 1983, […]
Ekaksh Commerce Pvt Ltd Vs ITO (Calcutta High Court) By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 27th April, 2022 under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, relating to assessment year 2018-19 on the ground that the same being without jurisdiction and contrary to the provision of Section 149(1)(a) and […]
Guidelines for filing/revising TRAN-1/TRAN-2 in terms of order of Supreme Court in the case of Union of India vs Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd.
Supreme Court dismisses Anshul Jain’s SLP challenging the re-opening notice under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act. High Court’s decision upheld
Ved Prakash Mittal Vs Union of India (Calcutta High Court) By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 29th July, 2022, relating to the assessment year 2014-2015 on the ground that the same being without jurisdiction and being barred by limitation since the […]
Bombay High Court stayed proceedings under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for AY 2014-15. Initial notice was issued after time limit expired
SS Commotrade Private Limited Vs ITO (Calcutta High court) By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 30th July, 2022 under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 relating to assessment year 2014-15, and, all subsequent proceedings based on the impugned notice dated 29th June, 2021 under Section 148 of the […]
Representation on issues faced by Assessee/taxpayer after introduction of Faceless Appeal Scheme, which require serious deliberation
Section 3(2) of the unamended 1988 Act is declared as unconstitutional for being manifestly arbitrary. Accordingly, Section 3(2) of the 2016 Act is also unconstitutional as it is violative of Article 20(1) of the Constitution.
