Delayed payment of employees contribution towards PF/ESIC not allowable: SC

Checkmate Services P. Ltd Vs CIT (Supreme Court)

The factual narration reveals two diametrically opposed views in regard to the interpretation of Section 36(1)(va) on the one hand and proviso to Section 43(b) on the other. If one goes by the legislative history of these provisions, what is discernible is that Parliament’s endeavour in introducing Section 43B [which opens with its non-obstante clause] was to primarily ensure that deductions otherwise permissible and hitherto claimed on mercantile basis, were expressly condi

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.