Read about the court’s inquiry order in Ansari Construction vs Additional Commissioner GST (Appeals) case. System responsibility for harassment, liability fixation awaited
National Internet Exchange of India Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) National Internet Exchange of India (NIXI) is engaged in carrying out running of internet exchange and registration of domain name. For running of internet exchange, the assessee is charging membership fees, connectivity charges, data transferred differential. For registration of domain name, the assessee the charges registration […]
Norton Lifelock Inc. Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune) The assessee sold software licenses to end users in India which was claimed as not chargeable to tax. The Revenue treated such amount as Royalty income. We thus primarily need to decide the nature of income earned by the assessee from the sale of software licenses as to […]
Sahara Hospitality Limited Vs State Of Maharashtra And Others (Bombay High Court) Heard Mr. Gautam Ankhad, learned counsel along with Mr. Patkar, learned counsel for the petitioner; and Ms. Chavan, learned AGP for the respondents. 2. By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has assailed legality and validity of […]
In continuation to the earlier Trade Notice(s) 30/2020-21 dated 13.10.2020, it is informed that the United Kingdom (UK) is being added as a country of Export on the e-COO Platform under Generalised Scheme of Preferences (GSP).
In re DKV Enterprises Private Limited (GST AAR Andhra Pradesh) Whether the marketing and consultancy services supplied by the applicant are liable under export of service or not? The service provided by the applicant is intermediary service as per section 2(13) of the IGST Act, 2017. The applicant is covered and fits into the definition […]
Jagdish U. Thackersey Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) It is well settled that mere fresh application of mind to the same set of facts or mere change of opinion does not confer jurisdiction even under the post-1989 section 147. The consistent view is that even after amendment of section 147 (w.e.f. 01.04.1989) mere change of opinion […]
IREO Grace Realtech Pvt. Ltd. Vs Abhishek Khanna & Others (Supreme Court of India) Section 14 of the 1986 Act empowers the Consumer Fora to redress the deficiency of service by issuing directions to the Builder, and compensate the consumer for the loss or injury caused by the opposite party, or discontinue the unfair or […]
Bliss Abode Pvt Ltd Vs Zonal Office Directorate of Enforcement & Ors (Delhi High Court) The Delhi High Court directed that n order to avoid a dispute in future and to ensure fairness and non-arbitrariness, the Registrar of the Adjudicating Authority under the PMLA shall ensure that in future, all orders passed by the Adjudicating […]
Calcutta Citizens’ Initiative, Representation on Extension of due dates of Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and also for extension of date for TAR and ITRs for asst year 2020-21. Calcutta Citizens’ Initiative 3, Ho Chi Minh Sarani, Ground Floor, Kolkata 700001 Ph – 033-2466-1000 Email: calcuttacitizens@gmail.com URGENT Ref. CII/Rep/2021/01 Dated: 9th January 2021 Shri P.C. Mody, Chairman, […]
