Procedure to be followed in cases of manufacturing or other operations undertaken in bonded warehouses under section 65 of the Customs Act-reg. OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, NS-I,III &V (APPRAISING MAIN (IMPORT) JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU CUSTOM HOUSE, NHAVA-SHEVA TAL-URAN, / RAIGAD —400707, MAHARASHTRA (e-mail- appraisingmain.jnchimp@gmail.com (Telephone No.022-27244779) No. S/22-Gen-133/2017-18/AM (I) Date: 28.05.2019 PUBLIC NOTICE […]
Sh. Sahil Mehta Vs M/s Salarpuria Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) Respondent has denied the benefit of the ITC to the buyer of the flats being constructed by him in contravention of the provisions of Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017, where he had not only collected more price than the […]
Govt. amends client due diligence norm under Money Laundering Act vide Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records) Second Amendment Rules, 2019 MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) NOTIFICATION New Delhi, the 28th May, 2019 G.S.R. 381(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) read with clauses (i), (jjj) and (k) of sub-section (2) of section […]
Instructions for filling out FORM ITR-2 These instructions are guidelines for filling the particulars in Income-tax Return Form-2 for the Assessment Year 2019-20 relating to the Financial Year 2018-19. In case of any doubt, please refer to relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the Income-tax Rules, 1962. 1. Assessment Year for which this […]
Madhav Gopaldas Shah Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) 1. This application is filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for regular bail in connection with File No. CCST/ADENF/FSU-7/MadhavArrest/2018-19/B.4 & AC/U-6/Arrest/2018-19/B.5811 of the office of the Chief Commissioner of State Tax, Flying Squad Unit-7, Gujarat State Ahmedabad […]
Tushar Trading Company Vs Principal Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi) Assessing officer has enhanced the declared value on the ground that those are not inconsonance with the current market price of similar goods being sold in the Indian market. However, the adjudication order does not indicate as to how and where the market survey has […]
In the era of globalisation, the world of Mergers & Acquisitions is witnessing rapid growth and the race amongst corporates to expand organically and inorganically is seeing significant momentum across the globe. Strategies that focus on core businesses or diversify into new businesses and markets, or even hive-off non-core businesses, are gaining momentum. This endeavour […]
In other words, the amount so incurred would be capitalized entitling the assessee to depreciation as per the eligible rate. The learned Members of the ITAT held that the facts of the instant case precisely fall within the ambit of Explanation 1 to section 32 and upheld the impugned order treating such amount as capital expenditure, eligible for depreciation.
Supreme Court has upheld Telangana High Court judgment in the case of P.V. Ramana Reddy Vs Union of India & Ors. that held that a person can be arrested by the competent authority in cases of Goods and Service Tax (GST) evasion.
Notification No. 22/2019-Customs (N.T./CAA/DRI) Principal Director General, Revenue Intelligence, hereby appoints officers mentioned in column (5) of the Table below to act as a common adjudicating authority to exercise the powers and discharge the duties conferred or imposed on officers mentioned in column (4) of the said Table in respect of noticee(s) mentioned in column (2) of the said Table for the purpose of adjudication of show cause notice(s) mentioned in column (3) of the said Table, namely:-